Childminders

Verified details and spatial scores for care structures registered within the directory.

Childminders

Unknown – Childcare (Domestic) (EY416574)

★★★★☆
Good

Historical inspection data indicates a trajectory of effective oversight, with previous regulatory evaluations highlighting a standard of provision consistent with a 'Good' rating. Recent specific metrics regarding the current 2026 inspection framework sub-evaluations—specifically concerning placement stability, the lived experience of the child, safeguarding effectiveness, and leadership and governance—are currently unquantified within the available dataset.

Placement Stability Narrative:

  • The available data lacks granular incident-level reporting regarding individual placement disruptions or short-notice admissions.
  • Consequently, specific behavioral patterns concerning emergency notice behaviors and the documentation of proactive de-escalation strategies cannot be formally evidenced from the current text summary.
  • Future monitoring requires detailed evaluation of how placement continuity is maintained and how staff manage escalation risks to safeguard young people against unplanned endings.
Capacity: 4 places
Childminders

Unknown – Childcare (Domestic) (EY416595)

★★★★★
Outstanding

This social care provision has a historical inspection record demonstrating high standards of quality, highlighted by an 'Outstanding' rating awarded in September 2025, alongside previous inspections in 2020, 2016, and 2011.

Analysis of the current 2026 SCCIF sub-evaluation framework indicates that specific metrics regarding lived experience, safeguarding, and leadership require ongoing monitoring alongside historical performance data.

Placement Stability Narrative:

  • Specific metrics regarding placement disruptions, emergency notice behaviors, and proactive de-escalation actions are currently unquantified in the evaluation dataset.
  • Historical inspection outcomes suggest a strong operational baseline, but continuous evaluation of placement continuity and early intervention strategies remains essential to mitigate risks of unplanned endings.
  • Leadership and governance frameworks must actively evidence how they track placement stability indicators and implement proactive de-escalation measures to maintain secure environments for children and young people.
Capacity: 4 places
Childminders

Unknown – Childcare (Domestic) (EY416606)

★★★★☆
Good

Based on the available historical inspection data and the transition to the 2026 Ofsted Social Care Common Inspection Framework (SCCIF), the evaluation of this social care provision focuses on core operational domains without assigning a legacy single-word overall outcome.

  • Leadership and Governance: Historical oversight demonstrates compliance with regulatory standards, though ongoing monitoring is required to align with current 2026 framework expectations.
  • Safeguarding Effectiveness: Past inspection outcomes indicate adherence to safety protocols, ensuring children and young people are protected from harm.
  • Lived Experience of the Child: Service delivery centers on meeting the individual needs of children, though contemporary qualitative metrics require continuous assessment under the updated SCCIF guidelines.

Placement Stability Narrative

The available raw inspection records do not explicitly detail granular metrics regarding placement disruptions, emergency notice behaviors, or specific proactive de-escalation strategies. Consequently, historical data reflects foundational stability, but robust longitudinal tracking of placement continuity and reactive versus proactive management remains necessary to fully evidence effective intervention strategies under the current regulatory framework.

Capacity: 6 places
Childminders

Unknown – Childcare (Domestic) (EY416824)

☆☆☆☆☆
Unrated

This intelligence summary reviews the social care provision based on available inspection history and evaluative parameters under the 2026 SCCIF framework, noting that specific contemporary metrics for sub-evaluations remain unquantified in the provided dataset.

Placement Stability Narrative

  • Disruption Patterns: Historical inspection records from March 2019 and July 2014 do not provide granular quantitative data regarding placement breakdowns, necessitating ongoing monitoring of placement lengths and unplanned endings.
  • Emergency Notice Behaviors: The current data set lacks specific evidence concerning notice periods given during placement terminations or escalating crisis behaviors requiring urgent intervention.
  • Proactive De-escalation: Documentation does not currently detail specific staff strategies or proactive de-escalation frameworks utilized to maintain placement stability and mitigate risks of sudden placement breakdown.

Note: In accordance with the 2026 Ofsted SCCIF framework, overall single-word outcome labels have been omitted. Further localized evidence gathering is required to fully populate lived experience, safeguarding, and leadership evaluations.

Capacity: 4 places
Childminders

Unknown – Childcare (Domestic) (EY416935)

★★★★☆
Good

Based on the available historical inspection records and the current evaluation framework, this social care provision demonstrates a foundational operational history, though specific granular metrics for recent sub-evaluations remain unrecorded in the provided dataset.

  • Placement Stability Narrative: The available data lacks specific, contemporary operational details regarding placement disruptions, emergency notice behaviors, or proactive de-escalation actions. Historically, the setting has maintained standard regulatory oversight (including a previous 'Good' rating), but a detailed pattern analysis of placement stability cannot be conclusively established from the current raw text. Continuous monitoring of placement lengths, unplanned endings, and staff de-escalation efficacy is recommended to ensure sustainable outcomes for children.
  • Lived Experience of the Child: Insufficient granular feedback is documented in the current text to fully evaluate the day-to-day emotional and physical well-being of the children from their own perspectives under the current framework.
  • Safeguarding Effectiveness: Historical compliance indicates adherence to baseline regulatory standards, though specific up-to-date indicators for risk management and child protection protocols require ongoing verification.
  • Leadership and Governance: Past inspections reflect functional oversight; however, leadership efficacy must be continually assessed against current regulatory standards and strategic improvement plans.
Capacity: 4 places
Compare Facilities 0 of 3 selected

Compare Side-by-Side

Icon depicting an adult and child holding hands, cradled by a protective hand, symbolizing the trauma-informed support and care provided for children in care by Looked After Child Limited.

Make a Lasting Difference

 

Every child deserves an environment where they feel safe, heard, and valued. Sign up to the Looked After Child Limited newsletter to learn more about our fostering and residential care communities, receive guidance on starting your career in care, and discover how you can support positive outcomes for vulnerable young people.

You have Successfully Subscribed!