Supported living
Verified details and spatial scores for care structures registered within the directory.
ExtraCare Charitable Trust New Oscott Village
Analysis of the historical inspection data indicates a series of regulatory oversight events recorded between 2011 and 2019 under the Care Quality Commission (CQC) framework. Due to the lack of detailed qualitative sub-evaluation metrics and the transition to the updated 2026 SCCIF framework, specific contemporary indicators regarding leadership, safeguarding, and the direct lived experiences of children cannot be fully evidenced from the provided text alone.
- Placement Stability Narrative: The provided historical dataset references periodic CQC inspection reports published up to November 2019, but lacks specific operational data concerning individual placement disruptions, emergency notice behaviors, or documented de-escalation pathways. Consequently, a comprehensive pattern analysis regarding placement stability metrics cannot be established from the available source text.
- Safeguarding Effectiveness: Historical CQC findings are noted on record, though granular insights into current risk-mitigation strategies and safeguarding practices are absent from the current data feed.
- Leadership and Governance: Regular inspection reporting history is established up to late 2019, requiring updated evaluations to determine contemporary management oversight and regulatory compliance under the current inspection standards.
ExtraCare Charitable Trust Princethorpe Court
Historical regulatory oversight for this social care provision indicates a series of inspection events published by the Care Quality Commission (CQC) between January 2013 and April 2016. Due to the lack of contemporary data within the provided raw text and the structural absence of current sub-evaluation metrics under the 2026 Single Inspection Framework (SCCIF), a detailed evaluation of current operational standards cannot be established from this dataset alone.
Placement Stability Narrative:
- The provided historical data lacks specific incident logs, admission/discharge metrics, or qualitative notes regarding individual placement histories.
- Consequently, it is not possible to identify established patterns concerning placement disruptions, instances of emergency notice behaviors, or the efficacy of proactive de-escalation strategies utilized by the staff team during the referenced historical timeline.
- Future analyses will require up-to-date operational records and qualitative case tracking to accurately assess how placement stability is maintained and how behavioral crises are managed.
ExtraCare Charitable Trust Reeve Court Village
This intelligence summary provides an objective overview of the social care provision based on available historical data and current evaluation metrics under the 2026 Social Care Common Inspection Framework (SCCIF).
- Placement Stability Narrative: There is currently insufficient quantitative data within the historical records to establish definitive patterns regarding placement disruptions, emergency notice behaviors, or proactive de-escalation actions. Further longitudinal tracking of placement lengths and exit reasons is required to evaluate stability outcomes comprehensively.
- Lived Experience of the Child: Feedback and direct qualitative metrics regarding the day-to-day experiences, wishes, and feelings of children residing within the provision remain undetermined within the current dataset.
- Safeguarding Effectiveness: Assessment data concerning risk management, staff vetting, missing-from-care protocols, and the overall physical and emotional safety of individuals is currently unknown.
- Leadership and Governance: Oversight mechanisms, quality assurance monitoring, and the impact of management practices on service delivery cannot be formally evaluated from the provided records.
Note: In accordance with the 2026 Ofsted SCCIF framework, overall single-word outcome labels have been omitted. Continuous monitoring and updated inspection inputs are required to fully populate all sub-evaluation metrics.
ExtraCare Charitable Trust Rosewood Court
Analysis of the historical inspection data and current regulatory context reveals the following intelligence summary for the social care provision:
- Placement Stability Narrative: Historic records indicate multiple CQC inspection reports published between 2011 and 2019. However, the provided dataset lacks contemporary, granular metrics concerning placement disruptions, emergency notice behaviors, or specific proactive de-escalation strategies. Consequently, a definitive pattern regarding placement stability cannot be empirically established from the available text.
- Lived Experience of the Child: There is insufficient qualitative or quantitative data within the current reporting period to evaluate the direct experiences, emotional well-being, and individual voice of children residing within the provision under the 2026 SCCIF parameters.
- Safeguarding Effectiveness: The raw text references historical health and social care oversight (CQC reports up to May 2019), but does not contain current operational evidence or risk-assessment data required to assess modern safeguarding policies, risk management, or protection mechanisms.
- Leadership and Governance: Oversight records confirm a history of regulatory engagement extending to 2019, yet the current data set lacks recent administrative evaluations, management audits, or evidence regarding the efficacy of current leadership systems.
ExtraCare Charitable Trust Ryfields Village
This social care intelligence summary provides an overview of the provision based on historical inspection activity and the current evaluation metrics under the 2026 Social Care Common Inspection Framework (SCCIF).
Placement Stability Narrative:
- The available historical inspection records spanning from 2012 to 2014 provide limited contemporary visibility regarding recent placement disruptions, emergency notice behaviors, or proactive de-escalation strategies.
- Under the current 2026 SCCIF evaluation structure, specific metrics concerning placement stability, the direct lived experience of the child, safeguarding effectiveness, and leadership governance are currently unquantified (Unknown) due to the absence of recent qualitative inspection narratives within the provided data.
- Continuous monitoring and up-to-date qualitative assessments are required to accurately evaluate patterns of placement continuity and the effectiveness of de-escalation frameworks.
