Supported living
Verified details and spatial scores for care structures registered within the directory.
ExtraCare Charitable Trust Humber Court
This social care provision intelligence summary outlines the historical oversight and operational context based on available regulatory data. As overall grading labels are excluded under the current framework, this analysis focuses on the structural and developmental indicators derived from historical inspection milestones.
- Historical Regulatory Context: The available records indicate a series of historical CQC inspection reports published between October 2012 and November 2017. These entries demonstrate a timeline of external regulatory monitoring, though specific granular findings regarding current operational standards are not detailed in the legacy data set.
- Placement Stability Narrative: The provided raw data contains no specific narrative or quantitative metrics detailing placement disruptions, emergency notice behaviors, or proactive staff de-escalation actions. Consequently, a definitive pattern regarding placement stability cannot be established from the historical records alone, requiring direct, up-to-date operational evidence to assess how effectively the setting manages transitions, prevents placement breakdowns, and maintains young people's tenure.
- Lived Experience of the Child: The current data set lacks specific qualitative insights reflecting the direct voice, daily experiences, and relational outcomes of children and young people residing at the provision.
- Safeguarding Effectiveness: There is insufficient contemporaneous data within the provided historical text to evaluate the current robustness of risk management, child protection protocols, and staff responsiveness to emerging safety concerns.
- Leadership and Governance: The overarching management oversight, internal auditing processes, and the strategic direction of the service require evaluation against current regulatory standards, as historical records are limited to past CQC publication dates.
ExtraCare Charitable Trust Imperial Court
Based on the available historical inspection data and the structural requirements of the 2026 Ofsted Social Care Common Inspection Framework (SCCIF), the following intelligence summary has been compiled for this social care provision.
- Lived Experience of the Child: The provided dataset contains historical CQC inspection records ranging from 2012 to 2017, but lacks granular, contemporary qualitative metrics concerning the day-to-day lived experiences, views, and progress of the children and young people currently residing in the setting.
- Safeguarding Effectiveness: Historical regulatory oversight (CQC) indicates routine monitoring, though specific, up-to-date qualitative evaluations regarding risk management, child protection protocols, and staff responsiveness within the current SCCIF parameters are marked as unknown.
- Leadership and Governance: Oversight mechanisms require ongoing verification against current regulatory standards, as the supplied text is limited to past CQC publication dates without contemporary leadership appraisals.
Placement Stability Narrative
A dedicated analysis of placement stability metrics, patterns of placement disruptions, emergency notice behaviors, and proactive de-escalation strategies cannot be definitively established from the provided historical CQC headline data alone. In accordance with the 2026 SCCIF standards, ongoing assessment is necessary to monitor whether the provider maintains consistent placement plans, successfully mitigates risks of unplanned endings, and implements effective de-escalation techniques to support long-term placement stability for children and young people.
ExtraCare Charitable Trust James Beattie House
As a UK social care intelligence analyst, the following summary has been prepared based on the available regulatory history and the 2026 Ofsted Social Care Common Inspection Framework (SCCIF) guidelines.
- Placement Stability Narrative: Historic records indicate previous regulatory oversight by the Care Quality Commission (CQC) with inspection reports published in November 2012, March 2014, and September 2016. Due to the historical nature of these records and the absence of contemporary operational data within the current dataset, specific metrics regarding placement disruptions, emergency notice behaviors, and proactive de-escalation actions cannot be definitively evaluated at this time.
- Lived Experience of the Child: There is insufficient current evidence to evaluate how children and young people experience the care environment, participate in decisions, or build trusted relationships with staff under the current evaluation framework.
- Safeguarding Effectiveness: Contemporary operational data regarding risk management, missing-from-care protocols, staff vetting, and the physical or emotional safety of residents is unavailable for analysis.
- Leadership and Governance: Oversight mechanisms, strategic management, regulatory compliance records, and staff supervision frameworks require active inspection data to formulate a comprehensive evaluation.
ExtraCare Charitable Trust Lark Hill Village
Analysis of historical inspection records indicates a regulatory history primarily overseen by the Care Quality Commission (CQC), with the most recent documented inspection event occurring in March 2018. Due to the absence of contemporary sub-evaluation data within the current framework, specific metrics regarding safeguarding, leadership, and the day-to-day lived experiences of children cannot be formally quantified at this juncture.
Placement Stability Narrative:
- The provided historical dataset lacks granular incident-level reporting regarding placement disruptions, emergency notice behaviors, or specific de-escalation actions.
- In the absence of detailed longitudinal data on admissions, unplanned endings, and crisis management, patterns of placement stability cannot be reliably inferred.
- Future intelligence updates will require current qualitative and quantitative oversight data to accurately assess how effectively the provision manages potential placement risks and maintains stability for children.
ExtraCare Charitable Trust Lovat Fields Village
Based on the available historical regulatory data, the provision's oversight history primarily reflects past Care Quality Commission (CQC) inspection reporting cycles spanning from 2011 through to February 2020. As formal evaluations under the 2026 SCCIF sub-metrics (lived experience, safeguarding effectiveness, and leadership and governance) are currently unrated, a complete contemporary assessment of day-to-day operational quality relies on up-to-date qualitative evidence.
Placement Stability Narrative:
- Placement Disruptions & Emergency Patterns: The provided dataset contains historical CQC publication records but lacks granular incident-level reporting regarding placement breakdowns, unplanned endings, or emergency notice behaviors. Consequently, a definitive pattern regarding stability metrics cannot be established from this text alone.
- Proactive De-escalation Actions: There is insufficient documented evidence within the current data payload to evaluate specific staff interventions, relational support models, or proactive de-escalation strategies utilized by the provider to sustain placements during periods of heightened crisis.
- Intelligence Analyst Recommendation: Continuous monitoring and a review of contemporary internal logs are required to properly assess how effectively the service manages placement transitions, mitigates risks of disruption, and promotes long-term stability for individuals in its care.
