Supported living
Verified details and spatial scores for care structures registered within the directory.
ExtraCare Charitable Trust Terryspring Court
Analysis of historical regulatory data for this social care provision indicates that available inspection records date primarily from historical CQC oversight periods (2012–2016). Contemporary structured sub-evaluation metrics under the 2026 Ofsted Single Children's Homes Inspection Framework (SCCIF) remain currently unpopulated or unknown due to the lack of recent published inspection cycles.
- Placement Stability Narrative: Based on the available historical dataset, there is insufficient current data to evaluate ongoing placement disruptions, patterns of emergency notice behaviors, or the efficacy of proactive de-escalation actions. Detailed longitudinal tracking of placement stability metrics under the current SCCIF framework requires updated regulatory evaluation.
- Lived Experience of the Child: Historical reporting lacks granular metrics concerning the day-to-day relational experiences, advocacy access, and individual progress of children residing at the setting.
- Safeguarding Effectiveness: Current evidence within the provided records is insufficient to verify the robustness of risk management protocols, staff vigilance, or multi-agency safeguarding partnerships.
- Leadership and Governance: Oversight mechanisms, strategic direction, and the direct impact of management oversight cannot be assessed from the legacy CQC documentation provided.
ExtraCare Charitable Trust The Rose Garden
Based on the available historical regulatory records spanning from 2011 to 2016, the provision has undergone previous inspections under the Care Quality Commission (CQC) framework. However, contemporary detailed qualitative evaluations for the current 2026 Ofsted Social Care Common Inspection Framework (SCCIF) sub-evaluations—specifically concerning the lived experience of the child, safeguarding effectiveness, and leadership and governance—are currently unknown due to a lack of recent granular data within the provided text.
Placement Stability Narrative:
- The supplied data text references historical inspection events occurring between 2011 and 2016, but lacks specific incident-level reporting, metrics, or qualitative details regarding placement disruptions.
- Consequently, it is not possible from the provided text to identify specific patterns concerning emergency notice behaviors, the frequency or triggers of placement breakdowns, or the historical implementation of proactive de-escalation strategies by the staff team.
- To establish a robust placement stability narrative under the current framework, up-to-date operational data regarding length of stays, unplanned endings, and behavior support plans would need to be reviewed.
ExtraCare Charitable Trust Verona Court
This social care provision's historical regulatory record includes inspection reports published by the Care Quality Commission (CQC) across multiple dates (November 2012, December 2013, July 2016, and August 2019). Detailed contemporary qualitative data addressing the specific 2026 SCCIF sub-evaluations—namely lived experience of the child, safeguarding effectiveness, and leadership and governance—is currently unavailable in the provided dataset.
Placement Stability Narrative:
- Data regarding specific placement disruptions, unplanned endings, or emergency notice behaviors is currently unrecorded within the evaluated metrics.
- Information detailing proactive de-escalation actions and their effectiveness in sustaining placements is absent from the provided historical records.
- Further operational intelligence is required to determine longitudinal trends concerning placement stability and continuity of care under current frameworks.
ExtraCare Charitable Trust Willowbrook
This intelligence summary provides an objective overview of the social care provision based on available historical regulatory data and the current evaluation framework.
- Regulatory History: Historical records indicate multiple CQC inspection reports published between 2013 and 2018, demonstrating a documented timeline of regulatory oversight and monitoring.
- Placement Stability Narrative: Within the scope of the provided data, specific quantitative metrics regarding placement disruptions, emergency notice behaviors, and proactive de-escalation actions are currently unrecorded or unknown. Consequently, a detailed pattern analysis of placement stability cannot be fully established from the raw text alone and requires ongoing operational tracking under current frameworks.
- Lived Experience of the Child: Direct qualitative insights regarding the day-to-day experiences, voice, and outcomes for children residing within the provision are currently unspecified in the evaluated metrics.
- Safeguarding Effectiveness: Specific operational assessments concerning risk management, child protection protocols, and safety measures are unstated within the current sub-evaluation dataset.
- Leadership and Governance: Information pertaining to management oversight, regulatory compliance, and strategic direction requires further localized inspection data to formulate a comprehensive evaluation.
ExtraCare Charitable Trust Yates Court
Analysis of historical regulatory records indicates a series of CQC inspection reports published between 2012 and 2019. Due to the limitations of the provided dataset, contemporary sub-evaluation metrics under the 2026 SCCIF framework—specifically concerning the lived experience of the child, safeguarding effectiveness, and leadership and governance—cannot be definitively quantified at this time.
Placement Stability Narrative:
- Placement Disruptions: The provided raw text lacks granular incident-level data regarding historical placement breakdowns or unplanned endings.
- Emergency Notice Behaviors: There is insufficient documentation within the available records to evaluate patterns of notice periods, crisis-driven placement terminations, or sudden placement instability.
- Proactive De-escalation Actions: The historical CQC summaries do not detail specific internal de-escalation strategies or multi-agency interventions utilized to sustain placements during acute behavioral episodes.
