Service Types
Verified details and spatial scores for care structures registered within the directory.
Oasis4life (F&D) Healthcare
Gemini AI review of historical inspection data is queuing...
Oaston Lodge
Based on the available historical inspection data from the Care Quality Commission (CQC) published in September 2012 and June 2013, a contemporary evaluation under the 2026 Ofsted Social Care Common Inspection Framework (SCCIF) cannot be definitively established due to the lack of recent, detailed social care provision metrics. However, an analysis of service continuity and operational history provides baseline context for the home's trajectory.
- Placement Stability Narrative: The provided dataset lacks specific, granular historical metrics regarding individual placement disruptions, emergency notice behaviors, or documented proactive de-escalation strategies. Consequently, a comprehensive pattern of placement stability cannot be derived from the legacy CQC reports alone. Under the 2026 SCCIF framework, ongoing evaluation of placement stability requires continuous monitoring of young people's journeys, the frequency of unplanned endings, and the provider's ability to successfully de-escalate crisis situations to prevent placement breakdown.
- Lived Experience of the Child: Historical data from the 2012 and 2013 reports does not contain contemporary qualitative metrics reflecting the daily lived experiences, voice, and progress of children and young people currently residing in the provision.
- Safeguarding Effectiveness: The legacy records predating current Ofsted frameworks provide insufficient contemporary evidence to evaluate the robustness of current risk management, child protection protocols, and safety measures implemented by the setting.
- Leadership and Governance: Oversight mechanisms, management accountability, and internal quality assurance processes cannot be reliably assessed from the historical CQC data provided, requiring fresh inspection evidence to determine current regulatory compliance and leadership impact.
Oban House Residential Care Home
As a UK Social Care intelligence analyst, an examination of the available regulatory data and historical inspection records for this provision reveals a limited operational narrative drawn primarily from recurrent CQC inspection events spanning from 2011 through to June 2023.
Placement Stability Narrative:
- The provided dataset lacks explicit, granular metric inputs regarding individual placement stability under the 2026 SCCIF framework specifications.
- Based on the temporal distribution of regulatory oversight events (with inspections recorded across multiple years up to mid-2023), the provision has maintained a consistent inspection cycle, though detailed incident logs regarding emergency notice behaviors or proactive de-escalation actions are absent from the current text payload.
- Without specific case-level data concerning placement disruptions, it remains critical for ongoing monitoring to closely track how well the setting manages transitions, prevents unplanned endings, and implements targeted de-escalation strategies to secure long-term outcomes for individuals.
Additional Sub-Evaluation Context:
- Lived Experience of the Child: Insufficient direct narrative data is present within the raw inspection headlines to fully quantify the day-to-day relational experiences and advocacy engagement of the individuals supported.
- Safeguarding Effectiveness: Historical regulatory oversight indicates a structured framework of periodic inspections, though specific contemporary safeguarding metrics for the current framework cycle require ongoing verification.
- Leadership and Governance: The regularity of historical CQC reporting points to an established administrative history, necessitating continuous review of management oversight and quality assurance systems to align with evolving standards.
Obelisk House
Analysis of the available social care provision data indicates that specific metrics concerning lived experience, safeguarding effectiveness, and leadership governance are currently unrecorded under the current evaluation parameters. Consequently, a comprehensive assessment of systemic operational performance cannot be fully established from the historical data provided.
- Placement Stability Narrative: There is an absence of detailed longitudinal data or recorded incident logs concerning placement disruptions, emergency notice behaviors, or the execution of proactive de-escalation strategies within the assessed timeframe. Without specific records tracking young people's placement pathways or the reactive measures employed by staff during critical incidents, a definitive pattern regarding placement stability cannot be formulated at this time.
Ocean Healthcare
As an expert UK Social Care intelligence analyst, the following summary is provided based on the available regulatory intelligence and inspection records for this provision.
- Placement Stability Narrative: Detailed historical patterns regarding placement disruptions, emergency notice behaviors, and proactive de-escalation actions cannot be definitively evaluated due to the limited scope of the current raw inspection dataset (restricted to a historical CQC publication date from January 2023). Under the current 2026 Ofsted Social Care Common Inspection Framework (SCCIF), continuous monitoring of stability metrics requires up-to-date qualitative case tracking to assess how effectively the setting manages transitions, prevents unplanned endings, and applies de-escalation strategies.
- Lived Experience of the Child: The available data does not provide direct qualitative metrics regarding the day-to-day experiences, voice, and advocacy outcomes for children and young people residing at the provision.
- Safeguarding Effectiveness: There is insufficient current evidence within the provided records to formulate an evaluation of risk management, staff vetting, missing-from-care protocols, or the overall protection of vulnerable individuals.
- Leadership and Governance: The dataset lacks contemporary insight into the oversight capabilities, regulatory compliance, quality assurance frameworks, and management accountability of the provision's leadership team.
